|
Report 103
Your newsletter on applied creativity, imagination, ideas and innovation in
business – delivered to your e-mail box on the first and third Tuesday
of every month.
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
Issue 108
Hello and welcome to another issue of Report 103, your fortnightly newsletter
on creativity, imagination, ideas and innovation in business.
As always, if you have news about creativity, imagination, ideas, or innovation
please feel free to forward it to me for potential inclusion in Report103. Your
comments and feedback are also always welcome.
Information on unsubscribing, archives, reprinting articles, etc can be found
at the end of this newsletter.
SLASH YOUR BUREAUCRACY!
I've often stressed in this newsletter the importance of simplicity in innovation.
From the structure of your innovation initiative to your product improvements,
you should always aim to make things simpler rather than more complex. Simple
innovation tools are more likely to be used by your employees. Simplified functionality
will make your technical products more appealing to most consumers. Services
that simplify complex processes appeal to clients.
But what about your company's bureaucracy? Study after study has shown that
those organisations with the least rigid bureaucracies tend to be the most innovative.
Companies like WL Gore and Associates (cited by Fast Company as the most innovative
company in America: http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/89/open_gore.html) and
Google are renowned for their lack of bureaucratic hierarchies and steady stream
of innovative new products. IBM was once infamous for its bureaucracies, right
down to the corporate 'uniform' of dark suit, white shirt, conservative tie
and wing tip shoes. IBM was also in deep trouble in the early 1990s owing in
part to its bureaucratic ways. Among the many things Louis Gerstner did, after
being made CEO of IBM, was to reduce internal bureaucracy and restructure IBM
as numerous smaller and less bureaucratic business units.
Government bodies, which are normally entrenched in bureaucracy, are usually
perceived as being among the world's least innovative organisations (although
there are, of course, notable exceptions).
Clearly, if you want to make your company more innovative, one of the first
actions you must take is to slash the bureaucracy. Take a look at all the procedures
that must be followed in any operational activity. And remove as many steps
as possible. Indeed, aim to remove all the steps!
An Overly Hierarchical Firm
I once did some consulting work for the Brussels office of a highly hierarchical
international company. Although the local office only had about 30 employees,
there were clear rules of communication. The hierarchy comprised employees,
managers, a general manager and a president for Europe, who was based in the
home country and only came to the Brussels office a few times a year for a couple
of weeks. The senior president for the entire company was based in the home
country and was totally unreachable by any but the European president.
In spite of the office's small size, it was absolutely forbidden for an employee
to communicate directly to the general manager, let alone the president, unless
the general manager spoke first (of course). Thus, for example, if an account
executive wanted to make a suggestion to the president, she needed to put it
to her manager, who needed to put it to the general manager who needed to put
it to the president. As you might imagine, very few ideas made it to the top.
And, indeed, the company had a reputation among clients for its lack of vision
and creativity.
Such a rigid hierarchy might seem reasonable – although I would argue
it is not – in an office with thousands of people. But it is ridiculous
in such an office with 30 staff. Not only does it stifle creativity, but it
is horrendously inefficient.
As a consultant, I was not subject to the hierarchical rules and several times
made 'off the top of my head' suggestions to the European President who appreciated
them. Indeed, at least one was implemented. Imagine how many more good suggestions
he would have received if his employees and middle managers could also suggest
ideas directly to him!
Two Sides to Slashing Bureaucracy
There are two sides to slashing bureaucracy. The first is actually slashing
the bureaucracy. The second is retraining employees to stop following the step-by-step
processes they have become accustomed to. If a business analyst has never been
allowed to approach the CEO directly, she will have a hard time feeling comfortable
walking into the CEO's office to share an idea – no matter how much the
CEO might want her to do precisely that.
If a division manager has had to sign off every purchase with a dozen people,
she will have to learn to feel confident in making the purchase based on her
own decision. It won't be easy at first.
Retraining for Zero Bureaucracy
Thus, staff need to be retrained to skip the bureaucracy and focus on actually
doing things, such as sharing ideas, trying out new concepts and experimenting.
These are the very activities that lead to innovative new products, services
and operational processes.
Pixar University (part of Pixar Animation Studio, the extremely creative production
house behind Toy Story, Monsters Inc, Cars and other films) actually trains
employees to share their ideas at an early stage and to solicit the ideas of
others in the firm in order to help them feel more confident about sharing ideas
early on.
Removing the Bureaucracy
Just like the best way to quit smoking is simply to stop smoking immediately,
the best way to quit bureaucracy is to slash it all in one go! Realistically,
you may not be able to go that far in your firm. Nevertheless, it is worth slashing
what you can. If you are in Europe, where business quiets considerably during
the summer months, you could take advantage of this quite period to experiment
by slashing as many bureaucratic processes as is possible in one division or
operational activity in your firm. You can then use the quiet period to evaluate
the results and plan further removal of bureaucracy. Elsewhere in the world,
removing bureaucratic processes in a single division – as a test bed –
may be a practical approach.
Go on, give it a try. You've got nothing to lose but pointless paperwork!
BOOK REVIEW: GROUP GENIUS
Regular readers of Report 103 know that I always like to differentiate between
individual innovation and organisational, or group, innovation. My main interest
and our company's business focus is very much on the latter: organisational
innovation. Many so called creativity and innovation experts lump both concepts
into one. That's a mistake. What makes a company innovative is different to
what makes an individual innovative. Moreover, many organisations are full of
creative thinkers, yet fail to be creative, much less innovative, companies.
If you want your company to be more innovative, you need to address issues of
organisational innovation. Otherwise, you may have a non-innovative company
full of frustrated creative thinkers!
Keith Sawyer's latest book, Group Genius, not only addresses group innovation,
but argues that virtually all innovation is the result of group innovation.
His is a compelling argument.
Keith argues that the notion of the sole creative genius, who makes a great
discovery or devises a world changing invention as the result of a creative
inspiration, is a myth. Sigmund Freud did not simply dream up his invention
of psychoanalysis as the result of an “aha moment”. Rather he solidified
ideas from across a vast network of colleagues. Albert Einstein, likewise, collaborated
with a colleagues and teams from around the world in order to define his theories
of relativity. Keith cites many similar solo inventors and innovators who actually
collaborated or borrowed their ideas from many others.
Perhaps the most intriguing concept of Group Genius, and a key theme throughout
the book, is that of improvisational innovation. Early on, we learn about an
improvisational theatre group called Jazz Freddy (which produced a number of
comic stars as well as the famous US television series Saturday Night Live).
In a typical evening's improvisation, the Jazz Freddy team would ask audience
members to name an event and a location. The ten member team would immediately
launch into a performance centred around the chosen words. Performances were
unpredictable, but entertaining and surprisingly coherent. Keith was intrigued
by their improvisational process and collaboration. So he began video taping
their work for his research.
Group Genius takes the concept of improvisational innovation witnessed at Jazz
Feddy and looks at how companies can and do use it to get more innovative results.
The findings, based on more than a decade of research, are thought provoking
and instructive.
Keith summarises his theory nicely. “In both an improv group and a successful
work team, the members play off one another, each person's contributions providing
the spark for the next. Together, the improvisational team creates a novel emergent
product, one that's more responsive to the changing environment and better than
what anyone could have developed alone. Improvisational teams are the building
blocks of innovative organizations, and organizations that can successfully
build improvisational teams will be more likely to innovate effectively.”
Of course, the improvisational team will make a lot of mistakes in its endeavours
to solve problems and develop innovative ideas. This is to be expected. Indeed,
Keith regularly stresses that innovation is a very inefficient process and there
is not much we can do about that. This notion will doubtless upset those who
believe they have found a short cut to innovation via some business process
or other (I am regularly hearing from such people, actually).
Group Genius is rich in examples from the business world and in particular
looks at examples from companies like W.L. Gore and Associates, IDEO and most
interestingly Semco, a Brazilian manufacturing company that has largely abolished
corporate hierarchy and bureaucratic rules in order to create a firm of equals
where any of the firm's 3000 factory workers can examine the firm's books and
decisions are voted on by all employees. Oh, and if a factory worker doesn't
have the knowledge to understand the accounts, she can sign up for a free course
that will teach her. Such an open, non-hierarchical structure is unusual enough
in companies of knowledge workers who are all well educated and well paid. But
it is unheard of in a manufacturing company in a developing company. Nevertheless,
you probably won't be surprised to learn that Semco out performed most Brazilian
firms.
Keith shatters many myths about creativity and innovation, particularly those
surrounding the lone creative genius, the “aha” moment when a brilliant
idea appears and the notion of a brilliant idea coming in a flash of inspiration.
He also tears apart the notion of carefully planned innovation – and indeed
that planning should be a part of innovation at all.
Overall, the book is excellent, with only a very few weaknesses. I would have
liked to have seen more about motivating unstructured teams. Although the issue
of rewards was touched on briefly - it seems rewarding the group equally as
a whole rather than rewarding individual members is more motivational –
there is room for more about motivation. I also felt that the book became slightly
unfocused towards then end.
Although the book is well researched, footnotes are not marked in the text.
Rather you must turn to the bibliography and seek the source via the page number.
As a result, the text of the book itself is cleaner and easier to read than
are footnoted pages. But for those who want to check references or learn more
about the topic, it can be awkward to have to check to see if references are
there.
Of course readers who believe that all business operations must be planned
to the last detail and who abhor unpredictability will not like the book at
all and will fail to be convinced by Keith's arguments. But that can't be helped.
Such criticisms are nit-picking. Overall, Group Genius is an excellent book
and one I would recommend to any manager who wants to improve the innovative
performance of her firm. Team leaders will also benefit from reading the book.
Proof of its value is that while taking notes for this book review I also took
notes on concepts to be applied in our firm.
Group Genius by Keith Sawyer is published by Basic Books who provided a review
copy. It is available in the USA and Canada, but has not yet been released in
the UK.
SUMMER TIME IS EXPERIMENT TIME
In many parts of Europe, business slows down tremendously in the summer months.
European workers generally get four weeks of holiday and take most of that time
off in August. America and Canada also become quieter, although with shorter
holidays, business does not quiet to the extent it does here in Europe. In other
countries with different climates and cultures, different periods are the time
when masses of employees take breaks and business slows down – at least
those businesses not associated with tourism and leisure. So, if you are not
in Europe or North America, save this article for your next holiday period.
If business in your company does slow down in the summer, that can make it
a good time to experiment with new approaches and activities which are likely
to produce innovative results, but which may be difficult to apply when your
business is moving at full operational speed.
Here are a few summertime experiments you can apply in your firm.
-
Slash bureaucratic processes. You've read the article above. Now apply
it. Summer holiday is the time to take action!
-
Experiment with office layout. If your firm is a cubical city, why not
try out different layouts, removing cubical walls or just encouraging people
to move around and work in different places, such as the picnic tables outside
the office, the stairs, conference rooms and anywhere they can.
-
Creativity and innovation training. With fewer operational demands, employees
have more time to focus on creativity and innovation training. If you don't
have the budget, why not look for a recent graduate or an aspiring professional
who might be willing to do low cost training in exchange for the reference.
I often advise would-be facilitators and trainers to do freebies for references
and experience.
-
Embark on an outrageous project. Turn your whole firm into a skunkworks
in August and encourage everyone to join a team exploring a highly creative,
risky and possibly outrageous idea for a new product, service or process.
-
Visit clients' premises and run brainstorming events, that include those
clients, on how to serve them better.
-
Make wacky prototypes. If you manufacture things, why not run a challenge
where designers and others try to make the most outrageous prototypes that
they can.
-
Remove all job titles for the month and let people do what they want 80%
of the time – reserving the remaining time for essential administrative
operations.
-
Try out Jenni idea management software service (I expect you were wondering
when I would throw in a commercial for Jenni, weren't you?). If you are
interested in exploring idea management – and I know a lot of companies
are – why not use the quiet summer months to give Jenni a try? You
can find more information at http://www.jpb.com/jenni/ - and we can provide
very attractive terms for your trial. Contact me or your nearest representative
to discuss (http://www.jpb.com/jenni/contact.php).
-
Something else radical and new for your firm. You probably don't need me
to make suggestions. Very likely you have been toying with ideas about how
to make your firm more innovative, but you've been reluctant to implement
your ideas for fear of the disruption they would cause and your unsureness
of their success.
IMAGINATION CLUB
After many months of inactivity, we have kick-started the Imagination Club
and it is active once again.
The Imagination Club is an e-mail forum for playing with ideas, responding
to creative challenges and talking about creativity and innovation. Members
are from all over the world and are a truly fascinating group. A recent round
of introductions humbled me!
To join the imagination club, just go to http://www.jpb.com/imagination/
and enter your name in the field.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Have got an opinion about any of the articles you have read in Report 103?
Do you simply want to talk innovation? If so, please
contact me! I have meet a number of fascinating people and have even made
a few good friends as the result of correspondence with readers like you.
LATEST IN BUSINESS INNOVATION
If you want to keep up with the latest news in business innovation, I recommend
Chuck Frey's INNOVATIONweek (http://www.innovationtools.com/News/subscribe.asp).
It's the only e-newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on all of the latest innovation
news, research, trends, case histories of leading companies and more. And it's
the perfect complement to Report 103!
Happy thinking!
Jeffrey Baumgartner
---------------------------------------------------
Report 103 is a complimentary weekly electronic newsletter from Bwiti bvba
of Belgium (a jpb.com company: http://www.jpb.com).
Archives and subscription information can be found at http://www.jpb.com/report103/
Report 103 is edited by Jeffrey Baumgartner and is published on the first and
third Tuesday of every month.
You may forward this copy of Report 103 to anyone, provided you forward it
in its entirety and do not edit it in any way. If you wish to reprint only a
part of Report 103, please contact Jeffrey Baumgartner.
Contributions and press releases are welcome. Please contact Jeffrey in the
first instance.
Return to Report 103 home/archives | Return
to top of page
* Notes
-
you may unsubscribe at any time by e-mail.
-
We use the double opt-in process. This means you will receive an
e-mail which you must reply to in order to subscribe. Although this
is a minor inconvenience, it ensures that only people who want to
receive Report103 actually do receive it.
-
We will not share your e-mail address with anyone else or send you
any e-mails other than Report 103 unless you contact us first.
|